From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re State

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Jan 12, 2021
308 So. 3d 707 (La. 2021)

Opinion

No. 2020-CK-01329

01-12-2021

STATE IN the INTEREST OF A.P.


Writ application denied.

Hughes, J., would grant.

Crichton, J., would grant and assigns reasons.

Crichton, J., would grant and assigns reasons:

I would grant the State's writ application. The delay occasioned by the district court's recusal was not attributable to the State and was outside of the State's control. Accordingly, in my view, the recusal and corresponding venue issues created in the juvenile court of Orleans Parish constitute "good cause" for suspending the time lines set forth in Ch. C. art. 877. See State in the Interest of R.M. , 17-281 (La. 3/13/18), 239 So.3d 820 ("The delay occasioned by the necessity of determining R.M.'s competency is not attributable to the state, and ... is beyond the state's control). I would therefore reverse the court of appeal and reinstate the juvenile court's denial of the motion to dismiss.


Summaries of

In re State

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Jan 12, 2021
308 So. 3d 707 (La. 2021)
Case details for

In re State

Case Details

Full title:STATE IN THE INTEREST OF A.P.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Jan 12, 2021

Citations

308 So. 3d 707 (La. 2021)