From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Slade

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Feb 29, 2016
185 So. 3d 1239 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 1D15–5834.

02-29-2016

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Randy SLADE, Respondent.

Elizabeth A. Parsons and Megan Marie Hall of Wilson, Harrell, Farrington, Ford, Wilson, Spain & Parsons, P.A., Pensacola, for Petitioner. C. Phil Hall of Taylor, Warren & Weidner, P.A., Pensacola, for Respondent.


Elizabeth A. Parsons and Megan Marie Hall of Wilson, Harrell, Farrington, Ford, Wilson, Spain & Parsons, P.A., Pensacola, for Petitioner.

C. Phil Hall of Taylor, Warren & Weidner, P.A., Pensacola, for Respondent.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writs of prohibition and mandamus is denied.

THOMAS, SWANSON, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Slade

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Feb 29, 2016
185 So. 3d 1239 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Slade

Case Details

Full title:STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. RANDY…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Feb 29, 2016

Citations

185 So. 3d 1239 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)