From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State Farm Life Ins. Co. v. Gatson

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 21, 2022
2:21-cv-09513-JAK-PVC (C.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-09513-JAK-PVC

03-21-2022

STATE FARM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. MARK GATSON, an individual; and JUSTIN BEARDSLEY, an individual, Defendants.


JS-6

ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR DEPOSIT, RELEASE AND DISMISSAL (DKT. 15)

JOHN A. KRONSTADT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Based on a review of the parties' Stipulation for Deposit, Release and Dismissal (the “Stipulation” (Dkt. 15)), sufficient good cause has been shown for the requested relief. Therefore, the Stipulation is APPROVED. The parties have agreed to resolve the present action on the following terms: (a) Plaintiff will deposit the disputed life insurance proceeds that are the subject of this litigation with a third party; (b) Defendants Mark Gatson and Justin Beardsley will release Plaintiff; and (c) Plaintiff will waive any request for reimbursement of its reasonable attorney's fees and costs in connection with bringing this action. See Dkt. 15. The action is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

State Farm Life Ins. Co. v. Gatson

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 21, 2022
2:21-cv-09513-JAK-PVC (C.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2022)
Case details for

State Farm Life Ins. Co. v. Gatson

Case Details

Full title:STATE FARM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. MARK GATSON, an…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 21, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-09513-JAK-PVC (C.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2022)