Summary
applying irrebuttable presumption of intent to harm to a boy who was 14 and 15 at the time of the sexual molestation
Summary of this case from Allstate Ins. Co. v. PattersonOpinion
1989.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
State Farm Fire Casualty Co. v. Robin
Court of Appeal of California
Jan 1, 1989
216 Cal.App.3d 132 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989)
Summaries of
State Farm Fire Casualty Co. v. Robin
Court of Appeal of California
Jan 1, 1989
216 Cal.App.3d 132 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989)
applying irrebuttable presumption of intent to harm to a boy who was 14 and 15 at the time of the sexual molestation
Summary of this case from Allstate Ins. Co. v. PattersonCase details for
State Farm Fire Casualty Co. v. Robin
Case Details
Full title:State Farm Fire Casualty Co. v. Robin R. and Sanchez v. Workers' Comp…
Court:Court of Appeal of California
Date published: Jan 1, 1989
Citations
216 Cal.App.3d 132 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989)
Citing Cases
State Farm Fire Casualty Co. v. Eddy
(12b), (15) State Farm's position is that an intent to injure may be inferred because the act constitutes…
Republic Indemnity Co. v. Superior Court( Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal.2d 450, 455 [ 20 Cal.Rptr. 321, 369 P.2d 937].) Two…