From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Clark

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 28, 2017
156 A.D.3d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

5292N Index 260125/14

12-28-2017

In re STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Petitioner–Respondent, v. James W. CLARK, et al., Respondents, 21st Century Assurance Company, Respondent–Appellant.

Burrati Rothenberg & Burns, Melville (Mitchell E. Pak of counsel), for appellant. Martin, Fallon & Mullè, Huntington (Richard C. Mullé of counsel), for respondent.


Burrati Rothenberg & Burns, Melville (Mitchell E. Pak of counsel), for appellant.

Martin, Fallon & Mullè, Huntington (Richard C. Mullé of counsel), for respondent.

Acosta, P.J., Richter, Mazzarelli, Andrias, Gesmer, JJ.

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, Bronx County (Elizabeth A. Taylor, J.), entered on or about August 3, 2016, which granted the CPLR article 75 petition and permanently stayed the subject uninsured motorist arbitration, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The hearing court properly found that additional respondents Olga Leon–Lobello and Santo Lobello were insured by additional respondent 21st Century Assurance Company on the date of the subject accident. 21st Century did not show that it timely mailed the requisite renewal documents to the Lobellos (see Weathers v. Hartford Ins. Group, 77 N.J. 228, 234–235, 390 A.2d 548 [1978] ; Lopez v. N.J. Auto. Full Ins. Underwriting Assn., 239 N.J.Super. 13, 24, 570 A.2d 994 [N.J. App.Div.1990], cert. denied 122 N.J. 131, 584 A.2d 206 [1990] ; NJAC 11:3–8.3 [b] ).

Even assuming that 21st Century had demonstrated that it mailed the requisite documents, it is undisputed that the Lobellos paid the premium within the policy coverage period, and six days prior to the accident. It is also undisputed that the Lobello's promptly notified 21st Century of the accident, and that 21st Century did not disclaim coverage until a day later. Moreover, 21st Century did not refund the premium payment until nearly two weeks after the accident. Under these circumstances, 21st Century's acceptance of the Lobello's premium estops them from denying coverage (see Cervone v. N.J. Auto. Full Ins. Underwriting Assn., 239 N.J.Super. 25, 29, 570 A.2d 999 [N.J. App.Div.1990] ).


Summaries of

State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Clark

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 28, 2017
156 A.D.3d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:In re STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Petitioner–Respondent, v. James…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 28, 2017

Citations

156 A.D.3d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
65 N.Y.S.3d 704
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 9250