From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel. Washington v. State

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Jan 28, 2019
262 So. 3d 893 (La. 2019)

Opinion

No. 2018-KH-0012

01-28-2019

STATE EX REL. Rodney WASHINGTON v. STATE of Louisiana


ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FORTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.


Summaries of

State ex rel. Washington v. State

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Jan 28, 2019
262 So. 3d 893 (La. 2019)
Case details for

State ex rel. Washington v. State

Case Details

Full title:STATE EX REL. RODNEY WASHINGTON v. STATE OF LOUISIANA

Court:SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Jan 28, 2019

Citations

262 So. 3d 893 (La. 2019)

Citing Cases

Washington v. Deville

Washington v. State, No. 17-KH-499 (La. App. 5th Cir. Nov. 17, 2017); State Rec., Vol. 8 of 12. State ex rel.…