From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State, ex Rel. v. Whims

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 10, 1941
38 N.E.2d 600 (Ohio 1941)

Opinion

No. 28755

Decided December 10, 1941.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Workmen's compensation — Action against noncomplying employer to recover award — Employment of three or more workmen — Father in employ of farmer — Sons, paid by father, held employees of farmer — Record of proceedings before commission prima facie evidence — Section 1465-74, General Code — Equal protection — Due process.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals of Franklin county.

Mr. Thomas J. Herbert, attorney general, and Mr. Wm. J. Berwanger, for appellee.

Mr. John W. Cooper, for appellant.


It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., TURNER, WILLIAMS, MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN and BETTMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State, ex Rel. v. Whims

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 10, 1941
38 N.E.2d 600 (Ohio 1941)
Case details for

State, ex Rel. v. Whims

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE, EX REL. HERBERT, ATTY. GENL., APPELLEE v. WHIMS, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 10, 1941

Citations

38 N.E.2d 600 (Ohio 1941)
38 N.E.2d 600

Citing Cases

Suez Co. v. Young

" State, ex rel. Herbert, Atty. Genl., v. Whims, 68 Ohio App. 39, appeal dismissed, 139 Ohio St. 137; Ohio v.…