Opinion
No. 26170
Decided November 25, 1936.
Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved — Aid for Aged Persons Law — Sections 1359-1 to 1359-30, inclusive, General Code — Due process and equal protection — Discretion as to neediness of applicant vested in administrative officials — Appellate Procedure Act — Sections 12223-1 to 12223-49, inclusive, General Code — Validity under Article IV, Section 6, Constitution — Mandamus in Common Pleas Court — Jurisdiction of Court of Appeals upon appeal on questions of law.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals of Montgomery county.
Mr. Joseph W. Sharts, for appellants.
Mr. John W. Bricker, attorney general, Mr. John K. Evans, Mr. Nicholas Nolan, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Ralph Gross, for appellees.
It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., STEPHENSON, WILLIAMS, JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.