Summary
In Libecap, the problem was not that the doctor's report was defective because claimant was placed in the sedentary category.
Summary of this case from State ex rel. Arnold v. Bureau of Workers' Comp.Opinion
No. 96-2352
Submitted July 8, 1998 —
Decided September 23, 1998.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APDO1-29.
Hochman Roach Co., L.P.A, and Gary D. Plunkett, for appellee.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Steven P. Fixler, Assistant Attorney General, for appellants.
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.
DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.
MOYER, C.J., dissents.
COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.
I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
COOK, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.