From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State, ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 22, 1931
177 N.E. 633 (Ohio 1931)

Opinion

No. 22912

Decided April 22, 1931.

Workmen's compensation — Mandamus — Delivery of warrant to claimant — Receivership and injunction instituted against claimant.

IN MANDAMUS.

Messrs. Chester, Chester Keyser, for relator.

Mr. Gilbert Bettman, attorney general, and Mr. R.R. Zurmehly, for defendants.


The petition herein for a writ of mandamus being submitted, and upon the facts shown, it appearing that relator is entitled thereto, a peremptory writ is hereby allowed and it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defendants, Wellington T. Leonard, Thomas Gregory and L.E. Nyeswander, as the Industrial Commission, be and are required to immediately, on being served with this writ, deliver to the relator, Brady Wartenbe, a certain warrant drawn on the treasurer of the state of Ohio by the Industrial Commission of Ohio, payable to the order of Brady Wartenbe, in the sum of $2152.55.

Writ allowed.

MARSHALL, C.J., JONES, MATTHIAS and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

DAY, KINKADE and ROBINSON, JJ., not participating.


Summaries of

State, ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 22, 1931
177 N.E. 633 (Ohio 1931)
Case details for

State, ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE, EX REL. WARTENBE v. LEONARD ET AL., INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Apr 22, 1931

Citations

177 N.E. 633 (Ohio 1931)
177 N.E. 633