From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. v. Graham

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Dec 22, 1936
63 P.2d 692 (Okla. 1936)

Opinion

No. 27065.

December 22, 1936.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Time for Perfecting Appeal not Extended by Unnecessary Motion for New Trial After Judgment on Agreed Statement of Facts.

When a cause is tried upon an agreed statement of facts, leaving for the court the sole question of application of the law to such facts, a motion for a new trial is unnecessary and unauthorized by the statute and does not extend the time within which an appeal may be perfected in the Supreme Court, and the time for perfecting such appeal runs from the date judgment is rendered and not from the date of the overruling of such unnecessary and unauthorized motion.

Appeal from District Court, Tulsa County; Thurman S. Hurst, Judge.

Proceeding for writ of mandamus by the State on relation of Investors' Syndicate against W.F. Graham, Water Commissioner of the City of Tulsa. From an order denying the writ, an appeal is prosecuted. Dismissed.

Yancey, Spillers Brown, for plaintiff in error.

H.O. Bland, E.M. Gallaher, and Milton W. Hardy, for defendant in error.


This is a companion case to cause No. 27064, State of Oklahoma ex rel. Investors' Syndicate v. Graham, decided Dec. 1, 1936, 178 Okla. 259, 62 P.2d 986. Upon the authority and holding of that case, this case is dismissed.

McNEILL, C. J., OSBORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, BAYLESS, BUSBY, and GIBSON, JJ., concur. WELCH, PHELPS, and CORN, JJ., absent.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. v. Graham

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Dec 22, 1936
63 P.2d 692 (Okla. 1936)
Case details for

State ex Rel. v. Graham

Case Details

Full title:STATE ex rel. INVESTORS' SYNDICATE v. GRAHAM

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Dec 22, 1936

Citations

63 P.2d 692 (Okla. 1936)
63 P.2d 692