From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State, ex Rel. v. Director of Agriculture

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 25, 1932
186 N.E. 92 (Ohio 1932)

Opinion

No. 23487

Decided May 25, 1932.

Supreme Court — Affirmances — Insufficient record for review — No bill of exceptions.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Franklin county.

Mr. John B. Osmun and Mr. Gerard Pilliod, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Gilbert Bettman, attorney general, and Mr. Isadore Topper, for defendant in error.


It is found that the cause was an original suit in the Court of Appeals, heard on the pleadings and evidence and decided upon questions of fact. It further appearing that no bill of exceptions was allowed in the Court of Appeals, and this Court being of opinion that the errors complained of are not properly presented without a bill of exceptions, it is ordered that the judgment of the Court of Appeals be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

MARSHALL, C.J., JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY, ALLEN, KINKADE and STEPHENSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State, ex Rel. v. Director of Agriculture

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 25, 1932
186 N.E. 92 (Ohio 1932)
Case details for

State, ex Rel. v. Director of Agriculture

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE, EX REL. BAUER v. DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: May 25, 1932

Citations

186 N.E. 92 (Ohio 1932)
125 Ohio St. 637