From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Thomas v. Indus. Comm

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 24, 1999
706 N.E.2d 1254 (Ohio 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-870.

Submitted February 9, 1999.

Decided March 24, 1999.

On Motion for Reconsideration.

Law Office of Thomas Tootle and Thomas Tootle, for appellant.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Jon D. Grandon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


The motion for this court to reconsider its judgment entry and decision in State ex rel. Thomas v. Indus. Comm. (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 370, 703 N.E.2d 1280, is granted.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed. The cause is returned to the Industrial Commission for relief consistent with State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.


I dissent and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Thomas v. Indus. Comm

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 24, 1999
706 N.E.2d 1254 (Ohio 1999)
Case details for

State ex Rel. Thomas v. Indus. Comm

Case Details

Full title:The State ex rel. Thomas, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Mar 24, 1999

Citations

706 N.E.2d 1254 (Ohio 1999)
706 N.E.2d 1254