From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel Schrunk v. Holm

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 1, 1984
685 P.2d 477 (Or. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

A 8208-04785; CA A30249

Argued and submitted July 9, 1984

Affirmed as modified August 1, 1984

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.

John C. Beatty, Jr., Judge.

Wayne Mackeson, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Des Connall, Portland.

Philip Schradle, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, Joseph, Chief Judge, and Young, Judge.

PER CURIAM

Portion of trial court injunction extending to premise "anywhere else within Multnomah County, Oregon" deleted. Judgment affirmed as modified.


This is an action to abate, as a nuisance, the use by defendant Wong of certain locations in Multnomah County as places of prostitution. The trial court abated the nuisance and enjoined defendant "from maintaining and conducting as a place for lewdness, assignation and prostitution, the premises [in question] or [premises] anywhere else within Multnomah County, Oregon." (Emphasis supplied.) On this appeal, defendant maintains that inclusion by the court of the underlined phrase exceeds the court's authority under the pertinent statutes, ORS 465.110 and 465.120. We agree. The emphasized portion of the trial court's injunction is deleted. As modified, the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

State ex rel Schrunk v. Holm

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 1, 1984
685 P.2d 477 (Or. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

State ex rel Schrunk v. Holm

Case Details

Full title:STATE ex rel SCHRUNK, Respondent, v. HOLM et al, Defendants. WONG…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 1, 1984

Citations

685 P.2d 477 (Or. Ct. App. 1984)
685 P.2d 477