From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel. Sandusky for Sandusky v. Sandusky

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Oct 25, 2022
168 Ohio St. 3d 1421 (Ohio 2022)

Opinion

2022-1103

10-25-2022

STATE EX REL. SANDUSKIANS FOR SANDUSKY v. SANDUSKY


CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS

In Mandamus. Reported at ––– Ohio St.3d ––––, 2022-Ohio-3362, ––– N.E.3d ––––. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. Motion of respondents city of Sandusky, Law Director Brendan Heil, Dick Brady, Dennis Murray, Blake Harris, Mike Meinzer, Steve Poggiali, Wes Poole, and Dave Waddington for removal to regular docket denied.

O'Connor, C.J., would deny as moot respondents’ motion for removal.

Donnelly and Brunner, JJ., dissent and would grant respondents’ motion for reconsideration.


Summaries of

State ex rel. Sandusky for Sandusky v. Sandusky

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Oct 25, 2022
168 Ohio St. 3d 1421 (Ohio 2022)
Case details for

State ex rel. Sandusky for Sandusky v. Sandusky

Case Details

Full title:STATE EX REL. SANDUSKIANS FOR SANDUSKY v. SANDUSKY

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio.

Date published: Oct 25, 2022

Citations

168 Ohio St. 3d 1421 (Ohio 2022)
196 N.E.3d 862