State, ex Rel. Sammet, v. Indus. Comm

Full title: THE STATE, EX REL. SAMMET, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET…

Court: Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Apr 24, 1991

570 N.E.2d 268 (Ohio 1991)

59 Ohio St. 3d 56

Opinion

No. 89-1831

Submitted August 29, 1990 —

Decided April 24, 1991.

Workers' compensation — Commission's order granting or denying benefits to a claimant must specifically state what portion of the evidence has been relied upon, and briefly explain the reasoning for its decision.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 89AP-14.

W. Michael Shay, for appellant.

Per Curiam.

For the reasons stated in State, ex rel. Noll, v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and issue a limited writ returning the cause to the commission to identify the nonmedical disability factors on which it relied and to briefly explain the reasons for its decision.

Judgment reversed and limited writ issued.

MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY, HOLMES, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, H. BROWN and RESNICK, JJ., concur.