Opinion
No. 20032. En Banc.
July 14, 1926.
Information in quo warranto filed in the supreme court May 10, 1926, to try title to an appointive state office. Writ denied.
Wright, Froude, Allen Hilen, Preston, Thorgrimson Turner, Chadwick, McMicken, Ramsey Rupp, and Peters Powell, for relator.
The Attorney General, Hartman Hartman, J.A. Coleman, Coleman Fogarty, and Horan Mulvihill, for respondent.
This case, in all essential particulars, is similar to that of State ex rel. Davis v. Johns, ante p. 525, 248 P. 423. The two cases were argued together. For the reasons given in the opinion in the other case, the writ applied for in this one will be denied.
I dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in State ex rel. Davis v. Johns, ante p. 525, 248 P. 423.
BRIDGES and MAIN, JJ., concur with ASKREN, J.