From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State, ex Rel. Pheils, v. Bates

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 18, 1991
577 N.E.2d 347 (Ohio 1991)

Opinion

No. 91-382

Submitted July 31, 1991 —

Decided September 18, 1991.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County, No. L-91-022.

David R. Pheils, Jr. and Marshall D. Wisniewski, pro se.


Appellants, attorneys David R. Pheils, Jr. and Marshall D. Wisniewski, seek to prohibit appellee, Lucas County Common Pleas Court Judge James D. Bates, from enforcing an order requiring them to retain counsel in two actions before that court. Appellants cite Svoboda v. Brunswick (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 348, 349, 6 OBR 403, 404, 453 N.E.2d 648, 649, to show that appellee has no judicial authority to prevent them from representing themselves, and State, ex rel. Butler, v. Demis (1981), 66 Ohio St.2d 123, 20 O.O.3d 121, 420 N.E.2d 116, to show that they have no adequate legal alternative to a writ of prohibition. These showings are sufficient to withstand dismissal pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6) (failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted) and, in the absence of any response from appellee, they are a sufficient basis for granting appellants relief pursuant to our plenary authority in extraordinary actions. Accordingly, the court of appeals' judgment is reversed and the writ of prohibition is allowed.

SWEENEY, DOUGLAS and WRIGHT, JJ., concur.

HOLMES, J., concurs in judgment only.

MOYER, C.J., H. BROWN and RESNICK, JJ., dissent.


Summaries of

State, ex Rel. Pheils, v. Bates

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 18, 1991
577 N.E.2d 347 (Ohio 1991)
Case details for

State, ex Rel. Pheils, v. Bates

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE, EX REL. PHEILS ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. BATES, JUDGE, APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Sep 18, 1991

Citations

577 N.E.2d 347 (Ohio 1991)
577 N.E.2d 347

Citing Cases

State v. Indus. Comm. of Ohio

{¶ 78} "Where the medical evidence on which the Commission is relying supports a conclusion that the claimant…

State ex Rel. Techneglas v. Indus. Comm.

Where the medical evidence on which the Commission is relying supports a conclusion that the injured worker…