From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Neumann v. Indus. Comm

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 16, 1998
698 N.E.2d 994 (Ohio 1998)

Opinion

No. 96-2444

Submitted July 15, 1998.

Decided September 16, 1998.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD12-1648.

Mitchell, Allen, Catalano Boda Co., L.P.A, William A. Catalano and Richard A. Cline, for appellant.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Laurel Blum Mazorow, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed. The cause is returned to the Industrial Commission for relief consistent with State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666.

DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.

MOYER, C.J., dissents.

COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.


I dissent and would affirm the court of appeals.

COOK, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Neumann v. Indus. Comm

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 16, 1998
698 N.E.2d 994 (Ohio 1998)
Case details for

State ex Rel. Neumann v. Indus. Comm

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE EX REL. NEUMANN, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Sep 16, 1998

Citations

698 N.E.2d 994 (Ohio 1998)
698 N.E.2d 994