From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel. Kinast v. Forchione

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 28, 2013
981 N.E.2d 902 (Ohio 2013)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Opinion

NO. 2013-0159

2013-01-28

State ex rel. Kinast v. Forchione


MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS


This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of prohibition and mandamus. Upon consideration of relators' motion for emergency stay and motion for expedited alternative writ, it is ordered by the court that the motions are denied.

O'Donnell, Kennedy, and O'Neill, JJ., dissent and would grant the motion for emergency stay and the motion for alternative writ on the request for writ of prohibition.

Summaries of

State ex rel. Kinast v. Forchione

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 28, 2013
981 N.E.2d 902 (Ohio 2013)
Case details for

State ex rel. Kinast v. Forchione

Case Details

Full title:State ex rel. Kinast v. Forchione

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jan 28, 2013

Citations

981 N.E.2d 902 (Ohio 2013)