From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Kaufman v. Sutton

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 24, 1970
231 So. 2d 874 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

Opinion

No. 69-614.

February 24, 1970.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, J. Fritz Gordon, J.

Schonfeld Feldman, Miami, for appellant.

Ruth Sutton, in pro. per.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.


The appellant filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, in and for Dade County, Florida, seeking the issuance of an alternative writ of mandamus commanding Ruth Sutton, as Justice of the Peace of District Three, Dade County, Florida, through her agents to accept the filing of a complaint for unlawful detainer, alleging a cause of action pursuant to § 37.011, Fla. Stat. (1967), F.S.A., averring that said complaint had been tendered to the justice of the peace or her agents and that they had refused to accept same for filing. The trial court refused to issue the alternative writ and this appeal ensued. We reverse.

The acceptance of the filing of a complaint is a mere ministerial act, and the officer charged with the responsibility of receiving same is required to accept what is tendered to him if it is accompanied by the proper fee. Newport v. Culbreath, 120 Fla. 152, 162 So. 340; State ex rel. Druissi v. Almand, Fla. 1954, 75 So.2d 905. See also: State v. Quarles, 13 Idaho 252, 89 P. 636; State ex rel. Wanamaker v. Miller, 164 Ohio St. 176, 128 N.E.2d 110; State ex rel. Dawson v. Roberts, 165 Ohio St. 341, 135 N.E.2d 409; Malinou v. McElroy, 99 R.I. 277, 207 A.2d 44. It is not incumbent upon one who has the ministerial function of accepting the filing of a complaint to judicially determine the legal significance of the tendered document.

By this opinion, we are neither approving nor disapproving the alleged cause of action for unlawful detainer, as this is the judicial function which should first be exercised by the trial judge. Newport v. Culbreath, supra.

Therefore, for the reasons above stated the order here under review, declining to issue the alternative writ of mandamus, is hereby reversed with directions to the trial court to issue the alternative writ and take such other proceedings as are consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Kaufman v. Sutton

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 24, 1970
231 So. 2d 874 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)
Case details for

State ex Rel. Kaufman v. Sutton

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, EX REL. B. KAUFMAN, APPELLANT, v. RUTH SUTTON, AS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 24, 1970

Citations

231 So. 2d 874 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

Citing Cases

Mayers v. Ridley

I. 24 App.D.C. 487 499 Id. 141 F.2d 912 231 So.2d 874 99 R.I. 277 207 A.2d 44 164 Ohio St. 176 177 128 N.E.2d…

Tanner v. State

Even when the lack of a correct file number affects the clerk's ability to "arrang[e the paper] in…