From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Jose v. City of Indianapolis

Supreme Court of Indiana
Nov 18, 1935
198 N.E. 297 (Ind. 1935)

Opinion

No. 26,234.

Filed November 18, 1935.

MANDAMUS — Municipal Boards — All Members Necessary Parties. — Where the only power to register plumbers was vested in a city's board of examiners of plumbers, consisting of five members, relator was not entitled to compel his registration by mandate against less than all members of the board.

From Marion Circuit Court; Harry O. Chamberlin, Judge.

Mandamus proceeding by the State of Indiana on the relation of Oscar A. Jose against the City of Indianapolis and others to compel relator's registration as a plumber. From a judgment for defendants, relator appealed. Affirmed.

B.D. Emanuel, for appellant.

Edward H. Knight, James E. Deery and Herbert M. Spencer, for appellees.


By this action the relator sought a judgment mandating the appellees to grant his application for registration as a plumber under an ordinance of the city of Indianapolis adopted pursuant to section 10990, Burns 1926, § 48-7402, Burns 1933, § 11533, Baldwin's 1934. The appellees answered in two paragraphs. There was a trial, and judgment for the defendants.

The ordinance in question creates a "board of examiners of plumbers" consisting of five members. The commissioner of buildings and the secretary of the board of health and charities are made members of the board ex officio. The ordinance authorizes this board of five members to issue certificates of registration to plumbers under certain conditions, and no other ordinance or statute is pointed out or suggested under which any other person, officer, or board is authorized to issue such certificates.

The complaint names and designates William Hurd, as Commissioner of Buildings, and Herman G. Morgan, as Secretary of the Board of Health, as defendants, but neither of said defendants has the power or authority to issue such certificates. It is only the board consisting of five members, sitting as a board, that has such power, and neither the board nor the remaining three members are made parties to the action.

No good purpose can be served by discussing the other questions which are sought to be presented, since they could not have affected the result.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Jose v. City of Indianapolis

Supreme Court of Indiana
Nov 18, 1935
198 N.E. 297 (Ind. 1935)
Case details for

State ex Rel. Jose v. City of Indianapolis

Case Details

Full title:STATE EX REL. JOSE v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Indiana

Date published: Nov 18, 1935

Citations

198 N.E. 297 (Ind. 1935)
198 N.E. 297