From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel. Hall v. State

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Mar 9, 2018
237 So. 3d 1178 (La. 2018)

Opinion

No. 2017–KH–2146

03-09-2018

STATE EX REL. Andrea HALL v. STATE of Louisiana


ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CONCORDIA

PER CURIAM:

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Untimely filed pursuant to La.S.Ct.R. X § 5.

Relator has now exhausted the right to obtain post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator has filed an application for post-conviction relief in the district court, and the district court's ruling denying relief is now final. Hereafter, unless relator can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted the right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.


Summaries of

State ex rel. Hall v. State

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Mar 9, 2018
237 So. 3d 1178 (La. 2018)
Case details for

State ex rel. Hall v. State

Case Details

Full title:STATE EX REL. ANDREA HALL v. STATE OF LOUISIANA

Court:SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Mar 9, 2018

Citations

237 So. 3d 1178 (La. 2018)