From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel. Fryer v. Murray

Supreme Court of Indiana
Apr 23, 1957
141 N.E.2d 700 (Ind. 1957)

Opinion

No. 0-473.

Filed April 23, 1957.

Original action by relator, Robert Royal Fryer, for writ of mandamus directed to William J. Murray as Judge of Lake Criminal Court.

Petition denied.

Robert Royal Fryer, pro se.


Petitioner has filed petition for writ of mandamus to compel the Lake Criminal Court to make and certify a true copy of all proceedings had against petitioner in cause No. 27,824 in said court, which appears to have been a prosecution for rape.

It appears from the petition that petitioner has rejected the services of the Public Defender of the State of Indiana and wishes to act as his own counsel and have a transcript furnished him at public expense.

Petitioner has no absolute right to a transcript of the record at public expense, but may only procure the same at public expense through the office of the Public Defender, when the latter deems it advisable. See: State ex rel. Fulton v. Schannen (1946), 224 Ind. 55, 64 N.E.2d 798; Burns' § 13-1405, 1956 Replacement.

As petitioner is not attempting to have the Public Defender procure a transcript at public expense but has rejected the services of the Public Defender, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

NOTE. — Reported in 141 N.E.2d 700.


Summaries of

State ex rel. Fryer v. Murray

Supreme Court of Indiana
Apr 23, 1957
141 N.E.2d 700 (Ind. 1957)
Case details for

State ex rel. Fryer v. Murray

Case Details

Full title:STATE EX REL. FRYER v. MURRAY, JUDGE, LAKE CRIMINAL COURT

Court:Supreme Court of Indiana

Date published: Apr 23, 1957

Citations

141 N.E.2d 700 (Ind. 1957)
236 Ind. 704

Citing Cases

Sutton v. Lash

The Suttons further stated that they were unable to pay the necessary cost to secure their transcript of…