From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel. Foster v. DeWeese

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Nov 30, 2011
959 N.E.2d 532 (Ohio 2011)

Opinion

No. 2011–1351.

2011-11-30

The STATE ex rel. FOSTER, Appellant, v. DeWEESE, Judge, et al., Appellees.

Joseph Foster, pro se. James J. Mayer Jr., Richland County Prosecuting Attorney, and Jill M. Cochran, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees.


Joseph Foster, pro se. James J. Mayer Jr., Richland County Prosecuting Attorney, and Jill M. Cochran, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

[Ohio St.3d 19] {¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the complaint of appellant, Joseph Foster, for writs of mandamus and procedendo to compel appellees, Richland County Court of Common Pleas and Judge James DeWeese, to issue a final, appealable order in his criminal case. Neither mandamus nor procedendo will compel the performance of a duty that has already been performed. See State ex rel. Rose v. McGinty, 123 Ohio St.3d 86, 2009-Ohio-4050, 914 N.E.2d 366, ¶ 2. Judge DeWeese's April 3, 2007 sentencing entry in the criminal case fully complied with Crim.R. 32(C) by including the jury verdict upon which his convictions were based, the sentence, the signature of the judge, and the time stamp indicating entry on the journal by the clerk of court. See State ex rel. Williams v. McGinty, 129 Ohio St.3d 275, 2011-Ohio-2641, 951 N.E.2d 755, ¶ 1.

Judgment affirmed.

O'CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and McGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State ex rel. Foster v. DeWeese

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Nov 30, 2011
959 N.E.2d 532 (Ohio 2011)
Case details for

State ex rel. Foster v. DeWeese

Case Details

Full title:The STATE ex rel. FOSTER, Appellant, v. DeWEESE, Judge, et al., Appellees.

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio.

Date published: Nov 30, 2011

Citations

959 N.E.2d 532 (Ohio 2011)
131 Ohio St. 3d 18
2011 Ohio 6038

Citing Cases

State v. Ball

{¶19} The second principle the Qualls Court found important is that "a trial court must provide statutorily…