From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Chatmon v. Haskins

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 23, 1998
84 Ohio St. 3d 1445 (Ohio 1998)

Opinion

No. 98-2478.

December 23, 1998.


In Habeas Corpus.

Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED

98-1464. State v. Kelly.

Medina App. No. 2670-M.

98-1905. State v. Jones.

Ashland App. No. 97COA01240.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

98-1916. State v. Murphy.

Cuyahoga App. No. 71775.

98-1917. State v. Caldararo.

Franklin App. No. 97APA12-1627.

98-1928. Cincinnati v. Univ. of Cincinnati.

Hamilton App. No. C-980161.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

98-1932. State v. Harris.

Cuyahoga App. No. 73041.

98-1936. Starr v. Dotsikas.

Cuyahoga App. No. 73201.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

98-1937. State v. White.

Ashland App. No. 97COA01229.

98-1938. State v. Pace.

Franklin App. No. 97APA10-1425.

98-1942. State v. Sherrills.

Cuyahoga App. No. 56777.

98-1943. State v. Sherrills.

Cuyahoga App. No. 62067.

98-1954. State v. Howard.

Montgomery App. No. 16901.

98-1959. Stan v. Quarto Mining Co.

Monroe App. No. 787.

98-1962. State v. Hutchinson.

Montgomery App. No. 16890.

98-1963. State v. Murphy.

Franklin App. No. 97APA10-1357.

98-1968. Russell v. Dreis Krump Mfg. Co.

Wayne App. No. 97CA0067.

98-1969. Mallory v. Keating.

Hamilton App. No. C-980160.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

98-1971. State v. Bumgardner.

Greene App. No. 97CA103.

98-1976. State v. Robinson.

Summit App. No. 19173.

98-1984. Hawkins v. Imboden.

Hamilton App. No. C-970827.

98-1985. State v. Hoffman.

Huron App. No. H-97-52.

Moyer, C.J., dissents and would hold this cause for the decision in 97-2730, State v. Smith, Butler App. No. CA97-01-011.

98-1988. State v. Dawson.

Franklin App. No. 97APA10-1300. (Appeal of Matthew R. Dawson and cross-appeal of state of Ohio.)

98-2003. State v. Norris.

Stark App. No. 1998CA00204.

98-2011. State v. Waldrop.

Franklin App. No. 98AP-102.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent.

98-2013. Fenley v. Bowman.

Clermont App. No. CA98-02-013.

98-2015. State v. Warren.

Hamilton App. No. C-970990.

F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

98-2018. Howard v. Seaway Food Town, Inc.

Lucas App. No. L-97-1322.

98-2024. State v. Pratts.

Summit App. No. 18705.

98-2026. Stychno v. Stychno.

Trumball App. Nos. 96-T-5620 and 97-T-0003. (Appeal of Margaret Stychno and cross-appeal of Nestor Stychno.)

Douglas, J., dissents.

Resnick, J., not participating.

98-2032. Larson v. L G Real Estate Dev., Inc.

Medina App. No. 2872-M.

98-2033. Feeney v. Eshack.

Summit App. Nos. 18464, 18473 and 18573.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent.

98-2035. State v. Trout.

Knox App. No. 97CA29.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

98-2036. State v. Robinson.

Montgomery App. No. 16157.

Cook, J., dissents

98-2037. State v. Whorton.

Hamilton App. No. C-970901.

98-2038. State v. Lippert.

Stark App. No. 1998CA00003.

98-2039. Yontz v. Griffin.

Hardin App. No. 6-98-9.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

98-2042. Martin v. Bedford Hts.

Cuyahoga App. No. 73725.

Douglas, J., would allow on Propositions of Law No. I.

Pfeifer, J., would allow.

98-2045. Behymer v. Schregardus.

Franklin App. Nos. 98AP-802 and 98AP-803.

98-2048. Szerlip v. Szerlip.

Knox App. No. 97CA31.

98-2051. State v. Wayt.

Butler App. No. CA98-03-063.

98-2052. State v. Smith.

Cuyahoga App. No. 72089.

98-2057. State v. Keith.

Crawford App. No. 3-98-05.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent.

Cook, J., would allow on Propositions of Law Nos. I and III and would hold this cause for the decision in 98-1627, State v. Calhoun, Lake App. No. 97-L-063.

98-2060. State v. Ward.

Richland App. No. 98CA46.

98-2062. Cotton v. Unknown.

Franklin App. No. 98AP-806.

98-2101. Plott v. Bruzzese.

Licking App. No. 98CA39.

98-2111. State v. Huher.

Hamilton App. No. C-971093.

Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., dissent and would allow on Propositions of Law Nos. I, II, and III.

98-2118. State v. Lindsey.

Hamilton App. No. C-971092.

Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., dissent and would allow on Propositions of Law Nos. I, II, and III.

98-2123. State v. Kelly.

Hamilton App. No. C-971080.

Douglas and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

98-2152. State v. Rocker.

Franklin App. No. 97APA10-1341.

98-2166. State v. Jackson.

Hamilton App. No. C-971015.

Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., dissent and would allow on Proposition of Law No. II.

98-2177. State v. Ginn.

Hamilton App. No. C-980120.

98-2280. State v. Avery.

Union App. No. 14-97-30.

98-2254. State v. Parnell.

Cuyahoga App. No. 68254.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Chatmon v. Haskins

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 23, 1998
84 Ohio St. 3d 1445 (Ohio 1998)
Case details for

State ex Rel. Chatmon v. Haskins

Case Details

Full title:State ex rel. Chatmon v. Haskins

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 23, 1998

Citations

84 Ohio St. 3d 1445 (Ohio 1998)