From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Bristow v. Toledo Blade

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County
Mar 6, 2001
No. 79194 (Ohio Ct. App. Mar. 6, 2001)

Opinion

No. 79194.

Decided March 6, 2001.

PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION, MOTION NO. 25238.

Lonnie Lee Bristow, pro se, Inmate No. 357-921, S.O.C.F., For Petitioner.

Legal Counsel, Toledo Blade, Legal Counsel, Portsmouth Daily Times, For Toledo Blade, et al.

Legal Counsel, Associated Press, For Associated Press.

Legal Counsel, Conan O'Brien, c/o NBC, For Conan O'Brien.

Michael Eugene Hay, pro se, Inmate No. 372-748, S.O.C.F., For Michael Eugene Hay.

Alan Johnson, Esq., c/o Columbus Dispatch, For Alan Johnson.

Frank Lewis, Esq., For Frank Lewis.

National Broadcasting Company, For National Broadcasting Legal Counsel Company.

Joe Saunders, Esq., For Joe Saunders.

Legal Counsel, WBNS 10-TV Inc., For WBNS 10-TV Inc.

Legal Counsel, WNWO, For WNWO.

Legal Counsel, WNXT, For WNXT.

Legal Counsel, WTOL, For WTOL.

Legal Counsel, WTVE, For WTVE.


JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION


Relator, Lonny Lee Bristow, has filed a petition for a writ of prohibition. Sua sponte, we dismiss relator's petition for a writ of prohibition.

In order for this court to issue a writ of prohibition, the relator must establish that: 1) the respondent is about to exercise judicial power; 2) the exercise of such judicial power is unauthorized by law; and 3) the denial of the writ will cause injury for which no other adequate remedy exists in the ordinary course of the law. State ex rel. Barclays Bank PLC v. Hamilton Cty. Court of Common Pleas (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 536; State ex rel. Largent v. Fisher (1989), 43 Ohio St.3d 160. Herein, the relator has named the Toledo Blade, WNWO, WTOL, WTVE, National Broadcasting Company, Conan O'Brien, Alan Johnson, WBNS 10-TY, Inc., Frank Lewis, WNXT, Portsmouth Daily Times, Michael Eugene Hay, Associated Press, and Joe Saunders as respondents. Not one of the aforesaid respondents is able to or about to exercise judicial power. Thus, the relator's petition for a writ of prohibition fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted which mandates that this court enter a judgment of dismissal pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6). See, also, State ex rel. Peeples v. Anderson (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 559.

Accordingly, we sua sponte dismiss the applicant's petition for a writ of prohibition. Clerk to serve notice of this judgment to all parties as provided in Civ.R. 58(B). Costs to relator.

_________________________________________ TIMOTHY E. McMONAGLE, PRESIDING JUDGE

MICHAEL J. CORRIGAN, J. and DYKE, J., CONCUR.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Bristow v. Toledo Blade

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County
Mar 6, 2001
No. 79194 (Ohio Ct. App. Mar. 6, 2001)
Case details for

State ex Rel. Bristow v. Toledo Blade

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OHIO EX REL. LONNY LEE BRISTOW, PETITIONER v. TOLEDO BLADE, ET…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County

Date published: Mar 6, 2001

Citations

No. 79194 (Ohio Ct. App. Mar. 6, 2001)