From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State Div. of Human Rights v. Neighborhood Youth & Family Servs.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 15, 2013
102 A.D.3d 491 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-01-15

In re NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, et al., Petitioners, v. NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES, Respondent.


Caroline J. Downey, Bronx (Toni Ann Hollifield of counsel), for New York State Division of Human Rights, petitioner.

Application pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to enforce petitioner New York State Division of Human Rights' (DHR) order, dated October 15, 2008, which found that respondent had discriminated against petitioner Angel Rivera on the basis of his gender, and, among other things, directed respondent to pay Rivera back pay in the principal amount of $11,511.67 and compensatory damages for mental anguish and humiliation in the principal amount of $10,000 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, Bronx County [Mark Friedlander, J.], entered September 29, 2011), unanimously granted, without costs.

DHR's findings are supported by substantial evidence ( see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176, 181, 408 N.Y.S.2d 54, 379 N.E.2d 1183 [1978];Matter of Bronx Cross County Med. Group v. Lassen, 233 A.D.2d 234, 235, 650 N.Y.S.2d 113 [1st Dept. 1996],lv. denied 89 N.Y.2d 813, 658 N.Y.S.2d 243, 680 N.E.2d 617 [1997] ). Respondent, which defaulted in this proceeding, obviously failed to rebut a prima facie showing that it had discriminated against Rivera on account of his gender ( see Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v. ARC XVI Inwood, Inc., 17 A.D.3d 239, 796 N.Y.S.2d 238 [1st Dept. 2005] ). The awards of back pay and compensatory damages are proper ( seeExecutive Law § 297[4][c][ii], [iii]; Matter of Mize v. State Div. of Human Rights, 33 N.Y.2d 53, 56, 349 N.Y.S.2d 364, 304 N.E.2d 231 [1973];Arc XVI Inwood, 17 A.D.3d at 239, 796 N.Y.S.2d 238).

SAXE, J.P., RENWICK, FREEDMAN, ROMÁN, GISCHE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State Div. of Human Rights v. Neighborhood Youth & Family Servs.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 15, 2013
102 A.D.3d 491 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

State Div. of Human Rights v. Neighborhood Youth & Family Servs.

Case Details

Full title:In re NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, et al., Petitioners, v…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 15, 2013

Citations

102 A.D.3d 491 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 162
956 N.Y.S.2d 892

Citing Cases

State Div. of Human Rights v. Austin

DHR's findings that Austin subjected Paleta to a hostile work environment on the basis of her race and…

N.Y. State Div. of Human Rights v. Int'l Fin. Servs. Grp.

Ct., N.Y. County 2011], affd in part, mod on other grounds in part 94 A.D.3d 563, 942 N.Y.S.2d 484 [1st Dept.…