From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Starratt v. Fermented Scis.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 8, 2023
4:22-cv-03895-HSG (N.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2023)

Opinion

4:22-cv-03895-HSG

02-08-2023

Lisa Starratt and Thomas Simmons Plaintiffs v. Fermented Sciences, Inc. Defendants

Hayley Reynolds, Attorney for Plaintiff William Cole, Attorney for Defendant


Hayley Reynolds, Attorney for Plaintiff

William Cole, Attorney for Defendant

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

[] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

[] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

[] Early Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge (ADR L.R. 7)

[] Private ADR (specify process and provider)

The parties are discussing settlement and will agree to a mediator.

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

[] the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR)

[] other requested deadline: 60 days from a decision on a motion for class certification

[] IT IS SO ORDERED.

[] IT IS SO ORDERED WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS.


Summaries of

Starratt v. Fermented Scis.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 8, 2023
4:22-cv-03895-HSG (N.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2023)
Case details for

Starratt v. Fermented Scis.

Case Details

Full title:Lisa Starratt and Thomas Simmons Plaintiffs v. Fermented Sciences, Inc…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 8, 2023

Citations

4:22-cv-03895-HSG (N.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2023)