From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Starks v. N/A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 6, 2013
Case No. 2:13-cv-00188-MMD-CWH (D. Nev. Feb. 6, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:13-cv-00188-MMD-CWH

02-06-2013

RENA E. STARKS, Plaintiff, v. N/A, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion/Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (#1), filed on February 5, 2013. Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. She has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis, and she submitted a complaint on July 3, 2012.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), a filing fee of $350.00 is required to commence a civil action in federal district court. The court may only authorize the commencement of an action without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor, by a person who submits an affidavit that includes a statement showing the person is unable to pay such costs. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). This Court's Local Rules provide that "[a]ny person, who is unable to prepay the fee in a civil case, may apply to the Court for authority to proceed in forma pauperis. The application shall be made on the form provided by the Court and shall include a financial affidavit disclosing the applicant's income, assets, expenses and liabilities." LSR 1-1.

Plaintiff's application is incomplete. In response to question three related to other income, Plaintiff indicates that she receives support in the form of "Spouse 62 on SSDI deemed below poverty level." The Court understands that Plaintiff may receive support from another governmental agency that she has deemed below poverty level, but that is not a sufficient ground for Plaintiff to not fully answer the question. Given that Plaintiff has not provided the amount of income she receives, the Court cannot determine if it exceeds her expenses. As a result, the Court cannot determine whether Plaintiff is eligible to proceed in forma pauperis.

Having concluded that Plaintiff is not entitled at this time to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court need not screen the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), which requires the dismissal of the case at any time if the Court determines that it is frivolous or malicious or fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. However, the Court notes that Plaintiff has failed to name a defendant in her complaint and she should correct that error in any subsequent filing.

Based on the foregoing and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (#1) is denied without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a complete Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. In the alternative, Plaintiff may make the necessary arrangements to pay the filing fee of three hundred fifty dollars ($350), accompanied by a copy of this Order. Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from the date on which this Order is entered to comply. Failure to comply with this Order will result in a recommendation to the District Judge that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis be denied with prejudice.

________________________

C.W. Hoffman , Jr.

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Starks v. N/A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 6, 2013
Case No. 2:13-cv-00188-MMD-CWH (D. Nev. Feb. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Starks v. N/A

Case Details

Full title:RENA E. STARKS, Plaintiff, v. N/A, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 6, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:13-cv-00188-MMD-CWH (D. Nev. Feb. 6, 2013)