From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Starkey v. Hernandez

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Jun 23, 2021
3:17-cv-01158-JLS-KSC (S.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2021)

Opinion

3:17-cv-01158-JLS-KSC

06-23-2021

ADAM MICHAEL STARKEY, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD HERNANDEZ, Defendant.


ORDER ALLOWING CONFIDENTIAL PHONE CALL BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND HIS COUNSEL [DOC. NO. 91]

Karen S. Crawford United States Magistrate Judge.

Before the Court is a motion for an order allowing a confidential phone call between plaintiff and his counsel. Doc. No. 91. Counsel is unable to meet with plaintiff in person at Centinela State Prison due to COVID-19 related restrictions on prison visitation. Id. at 1. Good cause appearing, counsel's motion is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff Adam Michael Starkey (AP1831) shall be allowed to have a confidential phone call with his counsel (Lawrance A. Bohm, Kelsey K. Ciarimboli, and/or Jared M. Kaye), in accordance with the protocol of Centinela State Prison. Centinela State Prison is requested to coordinate the call.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Starkey v. Hernandez

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Jun 23, 2021
3:17-cv-01158-JLS-KSC (S.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Starkey v. Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:ADAM MICHAEL STARKEY, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD HERNANDEZ, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Jun 23, 2021

Citations

3:17-cv-01158-JLS-KSC (S.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2021)