From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stark v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 16, 2024
23-mc-80326-JCS (N.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2024)

Opinion

23-mc-80326-JCS

02-16-2024

BRAYDEN STARK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. META PLATFORMS, INC., Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DKT. NO. 13

JOSEPH C. SPERO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiffs filed an administrative motion to consider whether material designated as confidential by Meta and Patreon should be sealed. Pursuant to Civ. L. R. 79-5(f), a designating party seeking to maintain material under seal must, within seven days of the filing of such a motion, file a declaration establishing that the designated material is sealable. Meta complied with that rule, see dkt. no. 18, but Patreon did not. Accordingly, Patreon is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the material identified in Plaintiffs' administrative motion should not be unsealed. Within seven days, Patreon shall respond by either: 1) filing a statement that the material may be filed in the public record and need not be sealed; or 2) filing a declaration that meets the requirements of Rule 79-5(c)(1) as to the designated material.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Stark v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 16, 2024
23-mc-80326-JCS (N.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2024)
Case details for

Stark v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BRAYDEN STARK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. META PLATFORMS, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 16, 2024

Citations

23-mc-80326-JCS (N.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2024)