Multiple theories of recovery do not necessarily mean multiple causes of action where there is but one wrong. Clarence E. Morris, Inc. v. Vitek, 412 F.2d 1174, 1176 (9th Cir. 1969); Staples v. O'Day Corp., 224 F. Supp. 576 (D.N.H. 1963); Guess v. Kellogg Switchboard Supply Co., 143 F. Supp. 807 (D.Cal. 1956). See Sessions v. Chrysler Corp., 517 F.2d 759, 761 (9th Cir. 1975).
As noted in the second case cited by Allen Bradley Company § 1441(c) is more restrictive than prior statutes. Staples v. O'Day Corporation, 224 F. Supp. 576 (D.N.H. 1963). See also 1A Moore's Federal Practice, ¶ 0.163[4.