From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stanton v. Tunica County School District

United States District Court, Northern District of Mississippi
Jul 26, 2021
3:20-CV-13-DMB-RP (N.D. Miss. Jul. 26, 2021)

Opinion

3:20-CV-13-DMB-RP

07-26-2021

CHARLETTE STANTON PLAINTIFF v. TUNICA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT; and DR. MARGIE PULLEY, individually DEFENDANTS


ORDER

DEBRA M. BROWN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On July 22, 2021, three days after this case settled as to all defendants, Charlette Stanton filed a motion asking that “pursuant to F.R.C.P. 54(b), the Court enter a Final Judgment of Dismissal, With Prejudice, as to .. Margie Pulley .. with each party bearing their own costs.” Doc. #87 at 2. Stanton represents that the defendants do not oppose the motion. Id. at 1.

See Doc. #85.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), “an action may be dismissed at the plaintiff's request ... by court order, on terms that the court considers proper.” Rule 54(b) authorizes a court to enter judgment as to fewer than all claims if it “expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay.” Based on the settlement reached, the Court concludes that dismissal of Pulley is proper and there is no just reason to delay such. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss [87] is GRANTED. The claims against Pulley are DISMISSED with prejudice. A final judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) will issue separately.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Stanton v. Tunica County School District

United States District Court, Northern District of Mississippi
Jul 26, 2021
3:20-CV-13-DMB-RP (N.D. Miss. Jul. 26, 2021)
Case details for

Stanton v. Tunica County School District

Case Details

Full title:CHARLETTE STANTON PLAINTIFF v. TUNICA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT; and DR…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Mississippi

Date published: Jul 26, 2021

Citations

3:20-CV-13-DMB-RP (N.D. Miss. Jul. 26, 2021)