Stanton v. Petersen

1 Citing case

  1. Sanders v. Lott

    630 A.2d 438 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1993)   Cited 4 times
    In Sanders, we found that welfare was not income and that it should not be considered as a circumstance for deviating from the support guidelines.

    This presumption is so strong that a written explanation is required when there is a deviation from the guidelines. Id.; See also Stanton v.Petersen, 413 Pa. Super. 470, 605 A.2d 819 (1992). In deciding whether to deviate from the amount of support determined by the guidelines, the trier of fact shall consider: