From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stansell v. Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colom. (Farc)

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 17, 2021
16-MC-00405 (LGS)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 17, 2021)

Opinion

16-MC-00405 (LGS)(SN)

12-17-2021

KEITH STANSELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. REVOLUTIONARY ARMED FORCES OF COLOMBIA (FARC), et al., Defendants.


ORDER

SARAH NETBURN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This document relates to:

Stansell v. FARC, No. 16-mc-0405

Pescatore v. Pineda, No. 18-mc-0545

On December 8, 2021, third-party defendants moved to unseal four documents, which are on the docket for this matter and the Pescatore docket. Plaintiffs do not oppose this motion and consent to unsealing two further documents on the Pescatore docket.

“The common law right of public access to judicial documents is firmly rooted in our nation's history.” Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119 (2d Cir. 2006). Absent any opposition, the Court grants the motion. The Court respectfully directs the Clerk of the Court to terminate the motions at ECF No. 411, and ECF No. 135 on the Pescatore docket and unseal the documents at ECF Nos. 119, 130, 166, and 176 on the Stansell docket, and ECF Nos. 37, 40, 46, 58, 85, and 91 on the Pescatore docket.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Stansell v. Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colom. (Farc)

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 17, 2021
16-MC-00405 (LGS)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Stansell v. Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colom. (Farc)

Case Details

Full title:KEITH STANSELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. REVOLUTIONARY ARMED FORCES OF…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 17, 2021

Citations

16-MC-00405 (LGS)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 17, 2021)