Stansberry v. State

Full title: Jherrit M. STANSBERRY, Appellant, v. STATE Of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Date published: Dec 18, 2012

388 S.W.3d 601 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 98472.

2012-12-18

Jherrit M. STANSBERRY, Appellant, v. STATE Of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Mark H. Neill, Judge. Lisa M. Stroup, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Andrew C. Hooper, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Mark H. Neill, Judge.
Lisa M. Stroup, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Andrew C. Hooper, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J., and ELLEN LEVY SIWAK, Sp.J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jherrit M. Stansberry appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying his request for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).