From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stanley v. Securus Techs.

United States District Court, Southern District of Georgia
Nov 8, 2023
CV 623-018 (S.D. Ga. Nov. 8, 2023)

Opinion

CV 623-018

11-08-2023

EDWARD STANLEY, Plaintiff, v. SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

J. RANDAL HALL, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT.

Before the Court is Plaintiff's stipulation of dismissal without prejudice of Defendants Securus Technologies, LLC, Alvin Stanley, Independent Technologies, LLC d/b/a Wintel, a division of Independent Technologies, LLC, and Dataonline Corp, d/b/a Anova under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. (Doc. 69, at 1-2.) The stipulation is only signed by Plaintiff. (Id. at 2.) Rule 41(a)(1), however, only allows a plaintiff to "dismiss an action without a court order by filing ... a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (emphasis added). The Eleventh Circuit has found a stipulation of dismissal that is "not signed by all parties who have appeared in th[e] case" is invalid. Hardnett v. Equifax Info. Servs., LLC, No. 21-13195, 2023 WL 2056285, at *1 (11th Cir. Feb. 17, 2023).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff' S stipulation of dismissal (Doc. 69) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. If Plaintiff wants to dismiss the above-named Defendants, the Parties are instructed to re-file this motion with the signatures of all parties that have appeared in this case,.

ORDER ENTERED.


Summaries of

Stanley v. Securus Techs.

United States District Court, Southern District of Georgia
Nov 8, 2023
CV 623-018 (S.D. Ga. Nov. 8, 2023)
Case details for

Stanley v. Securus Techs.

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD STANLEY, Plaintiff, v. SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Georgia

Date published: Nov 8, 2023

Citations

CV 623-018 (S.D. Ga. Nov. 8, 2023)