From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stanke v. West

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jul 20, 2018
No. 3:17-cv-938-PK (D. Or. Jul. 20, 2018)

Opinion

No. 3:17-cv-938-PK

07-20-2018

TIMOTHY P. STANKE, Plaintiff, v. A. G. WEST, Defendant.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued a Findings and Recommendation [31] on May 30, 2018, in which he recommends that the Court grant Defendant's Rule 37(d) Motion to Dismiss [26]. Because neither party timely filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings & Recommendation [31]. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion [26] is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 20 day of JULY, 2018.

/s/_________

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Stanke v. West

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jul 20, 2018
No. 3:17-cv-938-PK (D. Or. Jul. 20, 2018)
Case details for

Stanke v. West

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY P. STANKE, Plaintiff, v. A. G. WEST, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jul 20, 2018

Citations

No. 3:17-cv-938-PK (D. Or. Jul. 20, 2018)