Opinion
No. 3:15-cv-02318-YY
04-06-2018
JOE DEE STANG, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; RYAN HUNT (former DMD F.C.I. Sheridan); and JOHN KELSCH (DMD F.C.I. Sheridan), Defendants.
Joe Dee Stang Register No. 08958-023 F.C.I. Sheridan P.O. Box 5000 Sheridan, OR 97378 Pro se Plaintiff Billy J. Williams United States Attorney Jared D. Hager Assistant United States Attorney U.S. Attorney's Office 1000 SW Third Avenue, Suite 600 Portland, OR 97204 Attorneys for Defendants
ORDER Joe Dee Stang
Register No. 08958-023
F.C.I. Sheridan
P.O. Box 5000
Sheridan, OR 97378
Pro se Plaintiff Billy J. Williams
United States Attorney
Jared D. Hager
Assistant United States Attorney
U.S. Attorney's Office
1000 SW Third Avenue, Suite 600
Portland, OR 97204
Attorneys for Defendants HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You issued a Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") [64] on January 31, 2018, in which she recommends that this Court grant Defendants' motion for summary judgment [46]. Plaintiff timely filed objections to the F&R. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
When a party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
The Court has carefully considered Plaintiff's objections and concludes that the objections do not provide a basis to modify the recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and finds no error in the Magistrate Judge's F&R. // // // // // //
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge You's F&R [64]. Therefore, Defendants' motion for summary judgment [46] is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 6 day of APRIL, 2018.
/s/_________
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge