Opinion
No. 2021-451 S C
08-11-2022
Stand-Up MRI of the Bronx, P.C., as Assignee of Norma Richardson, Respondent, v. MVAIC Insurance Company, Appellant.
Marshall & Marshall, PLLC (David A. Gierasch of counsel), for appellant. Dash Law Firm, P.C. (James Errera of counsel), for respondent.
Unpublished Opinion
Marshall & Marshall, PLLC (David A. Gierasch of counsel), for appellant.
Dash Law Firm, P.C. (James Errera of counsel), for respondent.
PRESENT: ELIZABETH H. EMERSON, J.P., JERRY GARGUILO, TIMOTHY S. DRISCOLL, JJ.
Appeal from an order of the District Court of Suffolk County, Third District (C. Stephen Hackeling, J.), entered July 19, 2021. The order denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and granted plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, without costs, defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted and plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment is denied.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (MVAIC) (sued herein as MVAIC Insurance Company) appeals from an order of the District Court denying defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and granting plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.
It is undisputed that plaintiff was required to submit its claim forms to MVAIC within 45 days after the services at issue had been rendered (see 11 NYCRR 65-1.1; Synergy First Med., PLLC v MVAIC, 44 Misc.3d 127 [A], 2014 NY Slip Op 50964[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2014]) and that plaintiff did not do so. In support of its motion for summary judgment, MVAIC established that it had timely denied plaintiff's claims, based upon plaintiff's untimely submissions, and that it had informed plaintiff that MVAIC could excuse the delay if plaintiff provided "reasonable justification" for the delay (see 11 NYCRR 65-3.3 [e]; see also Matter of Medical Socy. of State of NY v Serio, 100 N.Y.2d 854, 862-863 [2003]; Mount Sinai Hosp. of Queens v Country Wide Ins. Co., 43 Misc.3d 139 [A], 2014 NY Slip Op 50780[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2014]). In opposition to MVAIC's motion, plaintiff demonstrated that it had initially sent the claims at issue to an insurance company, but after plaintiff learned that the insurance company would not cover the claims, plaintiff sent the claims to MVAIC. However, plaintiff did not establish that it had provided MVAIC with a reasonable justification as to why it had initially submitted the claims to the insurance company. As a result, plaintiff did not establish that it had provided MVAIC with a reasonable justification for its untimely submission to MVAIC of the claim forms (see Norman Y. Schoenberg, M.D., P.C. v N.Y.C. Tr. Auth., 39 Misc.3d 128 [A], 2013 NY Slip Op 50421[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2013]; Prestige Med. & Surgical Supply, Inc. v Chubb Indem. Ins. Co., 26 Misc.3d 145 [A], 2010 NY Slip Op 50449[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2010]).
Accordingly, the order is reversed, defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted and plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment is denied.
EMERSON, J.P., GARGUILO and DRISCOLL, JJ., concur.