From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stamps v. Varelas

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio
May 7, 1958
313 S.W.2d 141 (Tex. Civ. App. 1958)

Opinion


313 S.W.2d 141 (Tex.Civ.App. —San Antonio 1958) Lois D. STAMPS, Appellant, v. Nick VARELAS, Administrator of the Estate of E. L. Gibson, Deceased, Appellee. No. 13337. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio May 7, 1958

Joe Burkett, San Antonio, for appellant.

Pepos S. Dounson, San Antonio, for appellee.

POPE, Justice.

Appellant, Lois D. Stamps, sued Nick Varelas as Administrator of the Estate of E. L. Gibson, Deceased. The trial court instructed a verdict upon defendant's contention that the claim of $448 was barred by limitations. Appellant presented her claim on February 21, 1957. The administrator did nothing, and appellant contacted the administrator the next time on May 15, 1957. Section 310, Probate Code, V.A.T.S., provides that a failure of the representative of an estate to endorse on a claim, either his allowance or rejection, within thirty days after the claim is presented, shall constitute a rejection. Hence, the claim was rejected by operation of law on or about March 24. Appellant had ninety days after the rejection of her claim in which to file suit. Sec. 313, Probate Code. She did not file suit until the one hundred first day after rejection, and, upon the administrator's plea, it was then barred by limitations. Butler v. Fechner, Tex.Civ.App., 200 S.W. 1126. Appellant did not plead nor prove fraud, estoppel or waiver, which would avoid the limitations.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Stamps v. Varelas

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio
May 7, 1958
313 S.W.2d 141 (Tex. Civ. App. 1958)
Case details for

Stamps v. Varelas

Case Details

Full title:Lois D. STAMPS, Appellant, v. Nick VARELAS, Administrator of the Estate of…

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio

Date published: May 7, 1958

Citations

313 S.W.2d 141 (Tex. Civ. App. 1958)

Citing Cases

Pearson v. Bunting

She did not file suit until more than one-hundred and fifty days after the rejection and upon independent…

Green Machinery Company v. Smithee

Having brought its suit on September 16, 1969, some 15 months after the expiration of the 30 days, its suit…