From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stamos v. Warden-SVSP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 11, 2013
No. 2:11-cv-2722 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-2722 KJM CKD P

02-11-2013

JAMES GEORGE STAMOS, JR., Petitioner, v. WARDEN-SVSP, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's request for appointment of counsel (Docket No. 52) is denied without prejudice.

________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Stamos v. Warden-SVSP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 11, 2013
No. 2:11-cv-2722 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Stamos v. Warden-SVSP

Case Details

Full title:JAMES GEORGE STAMOS, JR., Petitioner, v. WARDEN-SVSP, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 11, 2013

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-2722 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2013)