Opinion
88-3404; CA A64339
Argued and submitted January 28, 1991.
Judgment modified in part; otherwise affirmed on appeal And on cross-appeal February 27, 1991
Appeal from Circuit Court, Clatsop County, James A. Mason, Judge.
Paul Saucy, Salem, argued the cause for appellant — cross-respondent. With him on the brief was Saucy Lipetzky, P.C., Salem.
D. Richard Fischer, Astoria, argued the cause for respondent — cross-appellant. With him on the brief was Larson Fischer, Astoria.
Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.
PER CURIAM
Paragraph 11 modified to reduce wife's judgment to $240,250; otherwise affirmed on appeal and on cross-appeal. No costs to either party.
Husband seeks review of a judgment of dissolution and makes five assignments of error; wife cross-appeals. Husband's only assignment that merits discussion is that the trial court made a mathematical error in computing the values of certain items of personal property. Wife concedes that the trial court erred when it valued the couple's Oregon personal property at $1,000. The true value is $2,000.
Wife's cross-appeal is without merit.
Paragraph 11 modified to reduce wife's judgment to $240,250; otherwise affirmed on appeal and cross-appeal. No costs to either party.