From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stalion v. Carroll Bank & Tr.

United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Eastern Division
Jul 28, 2022
22-cv-01075- STA-jay (W.D. Tenn. Jul. 28, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-01075- STA-jay

07-28-2022

TINA STALION, Plaintiff, v. CARROLL BANK & TRUST, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT

S. THOMAS ANDERSON, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff has filed a motion to amend her complaint. (ECF No. 13.) Defendant has not responded to the motion within the requisite time. For good cause shown, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff will have seven (7) days from the entry of this order in which to file her amended complaint. (ECF No. 13-1.)

In light of the filing of an amended complaint by Plaintiffs, Defendant's motion to dismiss is DENIED as moot. (ECF No. 11.) See Parry v. Mohawk Motors of Mich., Inc., 236 F.3d 299, 306 (6th Cir. 2000) (holding that the amended complaint supersedes all previous complaints and becomes the operative pleading)); see also Glass v. The Kellogg Co., 252 F.R.D. 367, 368 (W.D. Mich. 2008) (“Because the original complaint has been superseded and nullified, there is no longer a live dispute about the propriety or merit of the claims asserted therein; therefore, any motion to dismiss such claims is moot.”)

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Stalion v. Carroll Bank & Tr.

United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Eastern Division
Jul 28, 2022
22-cv-01075- STA-jay (W.D. Tenn. Jul. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Stalion v. Carroll Bank & Tr.

Case Details

Full title:TINA STALION, Plaintiff, v. CARROLL BANK & TRUST, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Eastern Division

Date published: Jul 28, 2022

Citations

22-cv-01075- STA-jay (W.D. Tenn. Jul. 28, 2022)