From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stakser v. Rodriquez

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 10, 1960
23 Misc. 2d 954 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)

Opinion

February 10, 1960

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of The Bronx, BERTHA SCHWARTZ, J.

Arnstein Schwartz ( Louis L. Schwartz of counsel), for appellant.

No one appearing for respondent.


The obligation of the tenants under the lease to reimburse the landlord for expenses incurred in remedying the tenants' default is a substantial obligation of the lease under section 8 of the Business Rent Law (L. 1945, ch. 314, as amd.). It properly applies to a proceeding which the landlord is compelled to institute to collect the emergency rent. As the tenants' failure to pay the counsel fee incurred in collecting the emergency rent is a violation by the tenants of a substantial obligation of the lease, entitling the landlord to dispossess the tenants, the landlord may collect the counsel fee in a summary proceeding.

The final order should be modified by increasing the amount of the rent found to be due to the sum of $77.64, without costs and as modified affirmed, with $25 costs to appellant.

Concur — HECHT, J.P., AURELIO and TILZER, JJ.

Final order modified, etc.


Summaries of

Stakser v. Rodriquez

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 10, 1960
23 Misc. 2d 954 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)
Case details for

Stakser v. Rodriquez

Case Details

Full title:DORA STAKSER, Appellant, v. GEORGE RODRIQUEZ et al., Respondents

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Feb 10, 1960

Citations

23 Misc. 2d 954 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)
200 N.Y.S.2d 475

Citing Cases

Seventy-Second St. Props. v. Woods

The second of the additional issues that should be decided is whether the petitioner would normally be…

Morningside Studios v. Lucille Hotel

(Cf. Barrow Realty Corp. v. Village Brewery Rest., 272 App. Div. 262; Stakser v. Rodriquez, 23 Misc.2d 954;…