From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Staiger v. Soht

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 6, 1908
84 N.E. 1120 (N.Y. 1908)

Opinion

Argued March 4, 1908

Decided March 6, 1908

Henry W. Rudd and McCready Sykes for appellants.

Henry Hoelljes for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, HAIGHT, VANN, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT and CHASE, JJ.


Summaries of

Staiger v. Soht

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 6, 1908
84 N.E. 1120 (N.Y. 1908)
Case details for

Staiger v. Soht

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER STAIGER, Respondent, v . CARL SOHT et al., Appellants

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 6, 1908

Citations

84 N.E. 1120 (N.Y. 1908)
84 N.E. 1120

Citing Cases

Larrowe Milling Co. v. Lyons Beet Sugar Refining Co.

This established an express warranty by defendant that the bulk of the material would be equal in kind and…

Electro-Tint Engraving Co. v. Am. Handkerchief Co.

It will be noted that no counterclaim is set up; that no amount of damage by way of offset is alleged, and…