From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stahl v. Goldman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jul 23, 1982
302 Pa. Super. 280 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1982)

Opinion

Argued January 12, 1982.

Filed July 23, 1982.

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Civil Division, Allegheny County, No. GD 77-9456, Narick, J.

Mark L. Unatin, Pittsburgh, for appellant.

Harvey Robins, Pittsburgh, for appellee.

Before HESTER, BECK and VAN der VOORT, JJ.


Appellee filed suit in assumpsit against appellant seeking to recover on an alleged oral guaranty. The court below found appellant liable in the amount of $5,000.00. Thereafter appellant filed a notice of appeal. The trial court directed appellant to file a statement of matters complained of on appeal. After such statement was filed the court issued its opinion.

Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 1038(d) requires that exceptions to a court's decision be filed within ten days of the decision. Matters not covered by exceptions are deemed waived. Here appellant has failed to file exceptions, therefore we must quash the appeal. Van Ameringen v. Arcadia Company, Inc., 299 Pa. Super. 444, 445 A.2d 837 (1982); Matczak v. Matczak, 275 Pa. Super. 164, 418 A.2d 663 (1980).

Appeal quashed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Stahl v. Goldman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jul 23, 1982
302 Pa. Super. 280 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1982)
Case details for

Stahl v. Goldman

Case Details

Full title:M. STAHL, Appellee, v. Harold H. GOLDMAN, Appellant

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 23, 1982

Citations

302 Pa. Super. 280 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1982)
448 A.2d 637

Citing Cases

Com. v. Florida-Eastern U.S. Van Lines

Accordingly, in Picker, the judgment of sentence was vacated and the case remanded for the filing of…