From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stahl v. Exxon Corporation

United States District Court, S.D. Texas
Jul 1, 2002
Civil Action H-99-3029 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 1, 2002)

Opinion

Civil Action H-99-3029

July 1, 2002


ORDER


"District courts may grant summary judgment sua sponte, `so long as the losing party was on notice that she had to come forward with all of her evidence.'" Nowlin v. Resolution Trust Corp., 33 F.3d 498, 504 n. 9 (5th Cir. 1994) (quoting Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 326 (1986)); accord Powell v. United States, 849 F.2d 1576, 1579 (5th Cir. 1988). A period of ten days is deemed reasonable notice. See Nowlin, 33 F.3d at 504 (citing FED. R. Civ. P. 56(c); Powell, 849 F.2d at 1579-80).

In light of this court's Memorandum and Order, signed July 1, 2002, granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants ExxonMobil Corporation and ExxonMobil Pension Plan, Plaintiff Beverly Ann Stahl has until July 15, 2002, to show cause why summary judgment should not also be entered in favor of Defendant Jacqueline Stahl.


Summaries of

Stahl v. Exxon Corporation

United States District Court, S.D. Texas
Jul 1, 2002
Civil Action H-99-3029 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 1, 2002)
Case details for

Stahl v. Exxon Corporation

Case Details

Full title:BEVERLY ANN STAHL, Plaintiff, v. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS EXXON…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Texas

Date published: Jul 1, 2002

Citations

Civil Action H-99-3029 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 1, 2002)