Opinion
April 15, 1976
Appeals from the Steuben Supreme Court.
Present — Marsh, P.J., Cardamone, Dillon, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.
Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Defendant-appellant contends that in this action for recovery of a fire loss Special Term abused its discretion by permitting plaintiff-respondent to amend the title of the summons by deleting the words "Patricia Staheli, d/b/a J K Upholstery Center, Inc.", plaintiff, therefrom and inserting in its place as plaintiff the words "J K Upholstery Center, Inc.". Patricia Staheli is in fact the principal stockholder and vice-president of the named corporation. Defendant argues that this change adds a new additional party who would be barred by the insurance policy's one-year limitation for commencement of the action after the loss had occurred. CPLR 305 (subd [c]) provides that: "At any time, in its discretion and upon such terms as it deems just, the court may allow any summons * * * to be amended, if a substantial right of a party against whom the summons issued is not prejudiced". The action was in fact timely commenced and certainly the defendant is not prejudiced by what was clearly a mistake. In a very similar fact situation we stated "It is elementary that mistakes or irregularities not affecting a substantial right of a party are not fatal. Mistakes relating to the name of a party involving a misnomer or misdescription of the legal status of a party surely fall within the category of those irregularities which are subject to correction by amendment, particularly when the other party is not prejudiced and should have been well aware from the outset that a misdescription was involved [citing texts and statutes]" (Covino v Alside Aluminum Supply Co., 42 A.D.2d 77, 80; Ryan v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 20 A.D.2d 270; Luce v Pierce Muffler Shops, 51 Misc.2d 256, affd 28 A.D.2d 826).